On Sep 4, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Sam Harwell wrote: > The new interfaces aren't required across the board, but would be used for > the vast majority of situations. By specifying the "ASTLabelType=xxxxx;" and > "TreeAdaptorType=yyyyy;" options, you could override the entire system.
Hi Sam, I was thinking about TreeAdaptorType, er, ASTAdaptorType option. I'm not sure exposing the concrete type of the adaptor helps very much and it's just one more thing to document and test. If I use the adaptor myself, it's usually to access the interface methods. Ter List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
