So as I wrote I read your previous posts ( and file comments of cause). So at first I was surprised enough that so much system resources was needed. But as Terence wrote "With 3.3 I find that it terminates in 12s on my box with 220M ram" (http://www.antlr.org/pipermail/antlr-interest/2011-April/041439.html). So I got the same result with antl 3.3. So build results depend on antlr version (different results on different antlr version). So with antl 3.4 the building process seems to fall into infinite loop and thus system resources don't matter. So with 3.3 build result is successful about few seconds, but the generated parser has some errors. The critical problem - I think - is that the parser has duplicated (identical) case in some switch statements. So I posted these thoughts.
Douglas Godfrey, I appreciate your work on SQL2003 parser. But I couldn't see the work result. Could you write your environment? Antlr version? Have you already use your generated parser in some another project? Because the generated parser has some another errors: "big grammar" problem with 64kbyte class - but it is another problem. Ivan Bludov List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
