fixed on trunk, thanks for the feedbacks!!! trunk started looking good... :) -Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lewis! > >> >> I'm thinking more about when we push them to the Apache repository... >> Having an any23-core, any-23-service, etc etc would be clean for pulling >> this and adding it into your POM or Ivy file. >> > > yes of course, indeed artifact IDs on POMs have to keep the any23-* > prefix for the most than valid reason you just explained, OTOH the > source directories on SVN don't need this prefix IMHO > >> Although the current plugins are exactly that, plugins, it might be great >> for people wishing to use them in an OSGi environment if we could make them >> something like any23-basic-crawler, any23-office-scraper, etc > > I had a chat on Michele time ago about why they didn't chose OSGi as > "plugin engine" but honestly I didn't get well the reason - I am not > an OSGi expert (but I'd like to be) > >> I also think >> that it might not be a bad thing to push out all of these to Apache repos. >> > > I would be interested on keeping them where they are, I think we can > develop a plugins community as well as the Apache Maven community > does, so people don't have to focus just on the core functionalities > but contribute back also with aux/accessories tools. > In that way the community has more chances to grow faster - and we can > get graduated sooner :P > >> I must admit though, these names are a wee bit messy. > > yes indeed we need a more coherence here, ALL artifacts must have the > required prefix otherwise is a little confusing also for us :P > > Thanks for your feedbacks, have a nice day! > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Simone, > >> Although the current plugins are exactly that, plugins, it might be great >> for people wishing to use them in an OSGi environment if we could make them >> something like any23-basic-crawler, any23-office-scraper, etc. I also think >> that it might not be a bad thing to push out all of these to Apache repos. >> >> I must admit though, these names are a wee bit messy. >> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Simone Tripodi >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi all guys, >>> >>> in our SVN, mvn modules *dir* name are a little inconsistent: >>> >>> <modules> >>> <module>any23-core</module> >>> <module>plugins/basic-crawler</module> >>> <module>plugins/html-scraper</module> >>> <module>plugins/office-scraper</module> >>> <module>plugins/integration-test</module> >>> <module>any23-service</module> >>> </modules> >>> >>> I suggest to strip the `any23-` prefix - what else should be? :) >>> OTOH, all artifact IDs should prefix `apache-any23`... >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Many thanks in advance, all the best! >>> -Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Lewis*
