[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13272219#comment-13272219
 ] 

Lewis John McGibbney commented on ANY23-83:
-------------------------------------------

Hi Peter, 

{bq} I am not familiar enough with the rest of the codebase to know why the 
shortlist of supported parsers is in place [bq}

Although I have tried to get to grips with as much of the codebase as I have a 
use-case for, I am sorry as I cannot provide insight into the original design 
considerations which you refer to... maybe one of the other guys could chime in 
here and clear the picture for us?

I must admit though, I am in agreement with your overall analysis and think 
that the more extensible we can make the Any23 libraries the better. There was 
some discussion however over in ANY23-19 where the vision was to have an 
abstraction layer between Any23 and the underlying RDF API's. In my opinion, 
this would provide far greater potential for us to make Any23 a more flexible 
library... wdyt?
                
> Remove hardcoded formats throughout Any23 to make it useful as a library
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ANY23-83
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-83
>             Project: Apache Any23
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.0
>            Reporter: Peter Ansell
>
> Many classes inside of Any23 seem to hardcode restrictions on the supported 
> formats, making it difficult to utilise Any23 as an extensible library. 
> One example of this are RDFSchemaUtils that artificially restricts itself to 
> three formats using an enum mapping, where it could easily accept any 
> RDFHandler, even if it were not an RDFWriter. 
> Another example is RDFUtils where the list of RDFParser's is hardcoded in, 
> and enforced using an enum.
> What was the reasoning for creating artificial format classes and manually 
> mapping them to writers/parsers instead of using either allowing any 
> RDFHandler in the first case, or allowing any accessible RDFParser in the 
> second case, using Rio.getParser() to avoid hardcoding anything.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to