Hi Reto :) want to drive? i could even sponsor you somehow (we should be able tofind a way) you get fame, money and all Gio
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > There are a couple of activities for client side linked data applications > (vie, create.js, rdfquery), I think it would be great to have an apache > community building backend independent rdf aware client. With the > maven-javascript-plugin and maven central the application can very easily > be integrated in the different Apache Semantic Web Applications. A > decoupled SparQLed client could be the basis of such a project. > > Reto > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Giovanni, >> >> The issue isn't so much which project but establishing a community around >> the codebase; after that it's just "details" and that isn't dependent on >> being an Apache project, sub-project or in incubation first. >> >> So do email Jena as a means to the end of getting some people involved in >> in interested sparqled - the Jena user list is probably the better place >> as you reach more people. >> >> Andy >> >> >> On 01/07/12 23:48, Giovanni Tummarello wrote: >> >>> thanks Andy for these comments. The thing about AGPL3 queries, wow >>> never thought of that :) >>> >>> we'll clarify these aspects for the next version. >>> >>> WRT to making it into an apache project, well most definitely i dont >>> see it as sufficiently related to any23 to make it part of it. >>> >>> This could be much moreof interest to Apache Jena? maybe i should ask >>> on that list? >>> >>> i feel such a newbie at successfully getting a project our as opensource. >>> :) >>> i mean we have released several things before, but this one i really >>> care for it to be picked up. >>> Gio >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Giovanni, >>>>> >>>>> IANAL but one comment on SparQLed - you should probably state what the >>>>> license situation for any generated query in the same way that parser >>>>> generators or compilers do. They usually say "the output is not >>>>> licensed". I think that unless you do this, the output of the editor is >>>>> under the license of editor itself, which is currently AGPL3. >>>>> >>>>> Other than that, I agree with Simone. If there is connection to Any23, >>>>> then the project can accept a software grant; if there isn't a separate >>>>> incubator proposal is cleaner. >>>>> >>>>> You've said you are going to license under the Apache license - you >>>>> don't need to submit to Apache to do that. You can use the license now >>>>> - the details are given in the appendix to the ASL 2.0 license. >>>>> >>>>> Andy >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Giovanni, >>>> >>>> I took a quick look at the github, and saw a JeniT tweet. >>>> >>>> I see that "This software contains code from the Flint SPARQL Editor >>>> project. " (IIRC that is an MIT license). >>>> >>>> Other bits say: "This software is copyright Aduna" which is 3-cluase >>>> BSD-type. >>>> >>>> Also, "works supported by the European FP7 project LOD2 (257943)." -- >>>> presumably DERI have copyright but is it exclusive to DERI? >>>> >>>> Whichever route is taken, this will need to be clarified and it's easier >>>> sooner rather than later. >>>> >>>> I don't immediately see any blockers. The third party copyright involved >>>> needs handling correctly but the two I see are "Category A", and an >>>> Apache >>>> project can include source code with the necessary text in NOTICE and >>>> LICENSE files. >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> >> >>
