On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:59:04 +0100 Gabor Gombas wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 02:27:30PM +0200, Delian Krustev wrote: > > > ring-buffer-size = 0 > > send-buffer-size = 1024 > > receive-buffer-size = 1024 > > Hmm, wait. You're using traditional send()/receive() instead of the > memory mapped ring buffer. Why?
I've disabled it due to: Jan 6 15:38:24 ggaoed[1360]: net/eth1: Failed to set up the TX ring buffer: Protocol not available Jan 6 15:38:24 ggaoed[1360]: net/eth1: Set up 2048 KiB ring buffer (1344 RX/0 TX packets) It seems to me that ( when it is enabled in the ggaoed configs ) it is only enabled for the received packets. I was not able to notice any performance differences between the two, and disabled it in order to have the same settings for RX/TX . Cheers -- Delian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Aoetools-discuss mailing list Aoetools-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss
