No, you need a clustered FS or a different approach: make your AoE target an 
NFS or SMB share. 

FYI, NTFS is not cluster aware either, you will get data corruption if you 
mount the same AoE target with an NTFS FS on top of it on two or more computers 
at the same time. 


Glenn 

----- Originele e-mail ----- 
Van: "Hetz Ben Hamo" <het...@gmail.com> 
Aan: "Ed Cashin" <ecas...@coraid.com> 
Cc: aoetools-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net 
Verzonden: Zondag 22 augustus 2010 18:36:34 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlijn / 
Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Wenen 
Onderwerp: Re: [Aoetools-discuss] Weird issue with aoe 



I understand that, so I would like to know: Is there a way to share a partition 
with several machine without going into clustered FS way? What about NTFS 
between 2-3 machines? 


Thanks, 
Hetz 


2010/8/22 Ed Cashin < ecas...@coraid.com > 


On Aug 20, 2010, at 7:55 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: 
... 

> Hello, 
> I have some really bizarre behavior with AOE. 

The behavior doesn't have to do with AoE so much as the use 
of a traditional, non-cluster filesystem from more than one host, 
which isn't something you can do without having things go wrong. 

(More comments appear below.) 

... 

> The problem: When I change a file in 1 machine, I don't see the changes on 
> the other machine, same thing happens when I try to erase/rename files, copy 
> etc. 

When a host mounts a filesystem, it keeps filesystem information 
in RAM as well as on persistent storage.  It assumes that the info 
in RAM is the same as the info on persistent storage so that it can 
avoid unnecessary I/O. 

In a cluster filesystem like GFS, hosts communicate with one another 
to let one another know when these assumptions are not valid, but 
with a traditional filesystem like ext2, there is no such mechanism. 
It's a single-host filesystem design. 

When you try to mount a filesystem from two hosts and they each 
wrongly assume, "I'm the only one mounting this filesystem," the 
info in their RAM does *not* match the info on persistent storage. 
Then you wind up with corrupt data on the persistent storage, as 
host A writes things that make sense only based on the info it has 
in RAM, even though host B has changed the persistent copy of 
that info! 

-- 
 Ed Cashin 
  ecas...@coraid.com 



-- 
my blog (hebrew): http://benhamo.org 
Skype: heunique 
MSN: hetz-b...@benhamo.org 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the 
BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________ Aoetools-discuss mailing list 
Aoetools-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Aoetools-discuss mailing list
Aoetools-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss

Reply via email to