Naviserver has added a lot of interesting features, and appears to be fairly mature.
I would have probably switched to Naviserver two years ago if they had documented some of their changes. The quantity of the contributions, and the interesting nature of many of them, make me feel that Naviserver is far from "end of life". When I switched (temporarily) to naviserver I found enough things that didn't work like aolserver, yet were totally undocumented, that the experience was very frustrating and I went back to aolserver. I was spending too much time reading C source code to figure things out. So... my personal vote for an aolserver v5 would be merging in lots of the naviserver code changes into aolserver. There's a lot of bang-for-our-buck there. Or, simply running with naviserver, if we (the aolserver community) can get it to a point where we're comfortable with it. -john On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Torben Brosten wrote: > Has anyone analyzed Naviserver performance and features vs. AOLserver > lately? > > It appears to remain compatible with Windows. > > The following forum post suggests Naviserver may be a contributing > factor to a significant overall performance increase: > > http://openacs.org/forums/message-view?message_id=3957131 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ aolserver-talk mailing list aolserver-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aolserver-talk
