unsubscribe

----- Original Message -----
From: "Automatic digest processor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Recipients of AOLSERVER digests" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 6:05 AM
Subject: AOLSERVER Digest - 25 May 2001 to 27 May 2001 (#2001-133)


> There are 4 messages totalling 119 lines in this issue.
>
> Topics of the day:
>
>   1. inittab problem (a classic i think) (4)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date:    Sun, 27 May 2001 18:17:27 +0300
> From:    Tuncay Baskan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: inittab problem (a classic i think)
>
> I think this question asked a lot. "Respawning too fast" is the most
> entry in my logs after adding aolserver to /etc/inittab. Here is my
> entry:
>
> nsp:2345:respawn:/www/bin/nsd -t /www/nsd.tcl -u nsd
>
> Aolserver normally runs quite happily. I mean it runs for a week
> without any problems. I don't understand why respawning occurs. Is
> this a problem with threads? Maybe init can't handle threaded apps?
> What can be the problem?
>
> --
> Tuncay Baskan.
> IT Manager @ Paramedya.com
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Sun, 27 May 2001 12:57:34 -0400
> From:    Dossy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: inittab problem (a classic i think)
>
> I don't use inittab for my AOLserver, but this is what I'm
> guessing is happening:
>
> If you don't specify -f to the nsd process, it goes off into
> the background.  Once control is returned to the init process,
> if the line is set to "respawn" it'll try to start up the
> process again.
>
> init then repeatedly tries to start nsd, and after a repeat-count
> is reached, says "respawning too fast" and stops trying for
> a short while.  Then, it'll start all over again after a certain
> amount of time passes.
>
> Perhaps adding -f and >>/www/log/server.log will do what you
> actually want.
>
> - Dossy
>
>
> On 2001.05.27, Tuncay Baskan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think this question asked a lot. "Respawning too fast" is the most
> > entry in my logs after adding aolserver to /etc/inittab. Here is my
> > entry:
> >
> > nsp:2345:respawn:/www/bin/nsd -t /www/nsd.tcl -u nsd
> >
> > Aolserver normally runs quite happily. I mean it runs for a week
> > without any problems. I don't understand why respawning occurs. Is
> > this a problem with threads? Maybe init can't handle threaded apps?
> > What can be the problem?
> >
> > --
> > Tuncay Baskan.
> > IT Manager @ Paramedya.com
>
> --
> Dossy Shiobara                       mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Panoptic Computer Network             web: http://www.panoptic.com/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Sun, 27 May 2001 09:49:56 -0700
> From:    Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: inittab problem (a classic i think)
>
> Tuncay Baskan wrote:
> >
> > I think this question asked a lot. "Respawning too fast" is the most
> > entry in my logs after adding aolserver to /etc/inittab. Here is my
> > entry:
> You might try using DJB's daemontools to control nsd. Unlike inittab,
> you can shut down the server without editing a file, and normal users in
> a particular group can control the server. My notes on setting up and
> using daemontools with AOLserver  is at:
>
> http://zmbh.com/discussion/svc/
>
> This isn't going to solve your respawn problem but it might help track
> it down, and then you can fix the problem without continuously editing
> /etc/inittab.
>
> --Tom Jackson
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Sun, 27 May 2001 21:35:36 +0300
> From:    Petru Paler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: inittab problem (a classic i think)
>
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 09:49:56AM -0700, Tom Jackson wrote:
> > > I think this question asked a lot. "Respawning too fast" is the most
> > > entry in my logs after adding aolserver to /etc/inittab. Here is my
> > > entry:
>
> (I deleted your original post by mistake)
>
> Do you have "-i" on your AOLserver command line?
>
> --
> Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of AOLSERVER Digest - 25 May 2001 to 27 May 2001 (#2001-133)
> ****************************************************************
>

Reply via email to