On 2001.08.20, Scott S. Goodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just found out today from Lamar Owen that the postgres 2.0 driver at
> OpenACS is the latest and greatest. The nspostgres 3.0 at aolserver.com
> is *not* the latest.
>
> It really should be called nspostgres and should be hosted at
> SourceForge if possible (my opinion). Also, both should be looked at and
> appropriate stuff (if any) merged into one version.
>
>
> Anyone have any thoughts or comments on this?
What is stopping us from just using the postgres driver at openacs.org
as a drop-in replacement for what's in CVS as nspostgres?
In other words, can I just bring nspostgres up to date by replacing
it with postgres 2.0 in CVS? Is there a reason this hasn't been done?
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/
