I have zero experience with shared libs, other than understanding what they're for. Seems like you already have it working this way, so I'll try it out. If you could, please send me any changes you made to the Makefile to do this. Putting openssl.so into AOLserver's /bin directory might eliminate the requirement to update LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
We don't use any code that's installed with the OS. All of our production binaries are compiled from scratched into a specific area so we know exactly what's being used, and so an OS upgrade from, say, RH 7.2 to 7.3 doesn't break something for us. /s. On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 08:39:57 -0400, "Peter M. Jansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Scott Goodwin wrote: > > > it's time to break OpenSSL into its own openssl.so module, and have it > > If you build OpenSSL as a shared lib, and the build procedures for > the AOLserver modules are friendly to that practice, do we really need > an > OpenSSL module? What would it do? > > Last time I built nsopenssl.so, I did it that way, and I've had no > problems other than that you may have to adjust the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to > include the place the OpenSSL shared libraries. > > Pete. > -- Scott Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scottg.net
