Cool -- I just copied you on a response to Jeremy about his version -- he did a lot of reformatting of the code mostly, but did add one command. He suggested we leave his version out of the import, but add the new command he created in manually.
Also, if we can get all the way back to 1.6, let's go 1.6 -> aD 2.6. I still want to unpack and confirm the versions and ordering, unless you've already done that and are confident you've sorted it out. /s. On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:22:26 -0400, "Jeff Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I have oracle 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 all as released from aD. > I checked and the copy of 2.6 at Eve's site and the OpenACS tarball > are the same. > > I also have the version from Jeremy Collins which he called 2.6 and > was based on the aD v2.5 but there are a lot of cosmetic changes and > it is hard to figure out what should be folded in to the next version. > The diff from aD 2.5 -> aD 2.6 is very small and easy to add to > Jeremy's > version but I am not sure how well his version has been tested. > > There is also a later version than the 2.6 release which Rob Mayoff > had (which hopefully Rob or Andrew will send to me shortly which was > ora8.c v 1.60 in the aD CVS). > > Also, there was a change that I never put into the released > version since it was never clear to me what the right answer > was (cf http://ccm.redhat.com/bboard-archive/webdb/000d9f.html ) > > I think what we should do is put up the 2.3 -> 2.6 sequence, then > try to pull in anything else that might have been fixed elsewhere > and make that 2.7beta. > > --Jeff > -- Scott Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scottg.net
