On 2002.09.30, Jamie Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like the Wiki and hope that people will update it and you will > continue hosting it.
Thanks. > I just didn't want to pollute it with my win32 related stuff, which I > know many people on this list don't care about. The wiki is not the mailing list. I'd like to see the wiki become the canonical documentation for AOLserver, and being that it can be edited and updated by /anyone/ without any kind of "authorization" or "privilege" I was hoping that the lowered bar for entrance to contribution would have lead to more contribution. I was wrong. What is it about the wiki that makes people not contribute to it? It is just as much a resource for you (plural) as it is for me. As long as it's AOLserver-related material, I'd like to see it on the wiki somewhere. Anyone can then feel free to help refactor or otherwise reorganize the content if they feel it's necessary. > It is also easier for me to work with things in table format sometimes > - I can quickly tell which modules I need to port next, etc. Can you give a specific example of what you're talking about? Perhaps it can be accomodated on the wiki? > I would be happy to copy any of my documentation that people find > useful to a more official / central server. My votes are to either get it into the SF CVS tree or on the wiki. Perhaps start on the wiki and move it to CVS if it proves necessary. -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Panoptic Computer Network web: http://www.panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
