There are actually three commands, all point to NsTclRegisterAdpCmd and have
an identical effect:
"ns_register_adptag", NsTclRegisterTagCmd, NULL
"ns_adp_registeradp", NsTclRegisterAdpCmd, NULL
"ns_adp_registertag", NsTclRegisterAdpCmd, NULL
ns_register_adptag
and
ns_adp_registeradp
ought to be considered deprecated.
/s.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter M. Jansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 4:29 PM
Subject: [AOLSERVER] ns_adp_registertag or ns_adp_registercmd?
> Another one.
>
> Both of these commands are registered, and run the same code, and the code
> does not appear to differentiate between the two. The current HTML docs
> define ns_adp_registertag, but do not define ns_adp_registertag. Should
> both be defined, with ns_adp_registercmd marked as deprecated?
>
> (I think it's a good idea to document all of the commands, even if they
> are deprecated, as long as they're in the code base. Deprecated commands
> and functions should be clearly marked as such. )
>
>
