http://ccm.redhat.com/bboard-archive/webdb/000Z6o.html

The ArsDigita post is reproduced in the bug report.

On Sunday 02 February 2003 10:09 am, Peter M. Jansson wrote:
> I think bug 230479 is the SCRIPT_NAME bug, although the aD Q&A entry it
> cites is no longer visible, as it appears these archives were not moved to
> RedHat.  The bug is currently assigned to kriston; I don't know how to
> attach the bug to the beta group, but perhaps you can do it?
>
> On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 10:36 AM, Nathan Folkman wrote:
> > In a message dated 2/2/03 10:34:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >
> >
> > I have read on the Wikit Wiki that nscgi sets the SCRIPT_NAME variable
> > incorrectly, but the report did not include an instance of what it should
> > have been vs what it was, and no bug was filed on the AOLserver
> > SourceForge tracker, as far as I know.  I don't think anyone has a patch
> > for this.
> >
> >
> >
> > If someone could please file a bug under the aolserver_v4_r0_beta_1 group
> > and we'll take a look.
> >
> > - Nathan

Reply via email to