The code in AOLserver's http.tcl and nsopenssl's https.tcl is mostly
identical - no surprise as Scott explictly says he basaed https.tcl on
http.tcl.  However, from a code maintenance point of view, this is
awfully ugly.  (Fixing the same bugs and adding the same features
twice, etc.)

Suggestions on how this could or should be improved?  Perhaps the
http.tcl shipped with AOLserver should simply be conditionalized to
provide both the http and https versions of the functions?

--
Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.piskorski.com


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of 
your email blank.

Reply via email to