On Tuesday 04 November 2003 03:37, you wrote: > On 2003.11.03, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think there is a need for a better solution. > > Is this what you are willing to discuss? > > Yes and no. What I'm willing to discuss is if there is a need for /a/ > solution. Then, we can talk about better ones ...
This very thread is the proof that there is need for this, or? Is this a good enough for you? Besides, I'm not that phylosophical about the matter. I see this really pragmatically: AS has some internal "limitations" (or call this like you'd like) which can be trivially rectified. If we have to discuss this triviality *that long*, than I'm really afraid what would happen if some major change should be discussed? We'd be totally paralized and would just run in circles, with time passing by... This is a highly sensitive matter and could bring to a show-stop for an open source project. This project has already experienced a fork, but thanks to some nice people at AOL, everything is in place for some time again. BTW, I'm also in the Tcl development group. If we were to discuss all minor changes that *much* and that *long* we'd be still sitting on Tcl 7.4. Digest auth or not, if we can bring AS to be more versatile with *minimal* effort, what not doing this? I really do not undersand the point of this thread any more. Zoran -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
