On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:33:10AM -0500, Joshua Ginsberg wrote: > I originally asked the question because I work for a regional ISP that's > looking to host up to about 5000 virtual servers. And we are seriously
Aha, a real live mass hosting provider! It's quite interesting to hear your take on these sorts of architecture/infrastructure issues. So, how well does the simple minded (but currently supported) "5000 smallish tuned AOLserver processes for 5000 websites" method work, or how badly does it fail? Did you test that? How far down would you have to push the AOLserver resource usage (by whatever unspecified method) in order for it to make technical and economic sense for you to host those 5000 virtual servers using AOLserver? > Not trying to completely contradict you, but we're a hosting operation and > we would deploy AOLServer if it did everything we wanted. Because Apache > doesn't. Interesting. -- Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.piskorski.com/ -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
