On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:19:55 -0700
Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 02:24, Bob Woodside wrote:
>
> > Not to minimize the issue of supporting Redbrick, but as far
> > as I can tell this just consists of an ifdef to include specially
> > named versions of sql.h and sqlext.h for Redbrick. Trivial
> > change either way.
>
> If this is true, we can probably combine nssolid as well, since that
> is the main difference, if I remember.
> However the question is what to do if you ever need to run two of
> these modules at the same time? Is there a way of making things not
> conflict in such a case?
Good question. The only thing I can think of is to have one
common source module that generates differently named executable modules
depending on whether you build for generic ODBC, Redbrick, Solid, or
whatever.
Any ideas on the subject, Dossy? Has anyone run into this need?
Cheers,
Bob
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of
your email blank.
