I definitely vote for a). I think AS has a very powerful framework that can be used outside of http.
--- Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 17 August 2004 10:32, Zoran Vasiljevic > wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I would like to start a discussion which will > eventually lead > > to one of the two proposals listed below (one from > Vlad Seryakov > > and the other from Stephen Deasey) included in the > core-server > > distribution. > > Eh... wrong turn again... > By "start a discussion", I really expected the > people to > respond with: > > a. YES, I like AS to be more powerful > multiprotocol > server instead of being a powerful http-server > only. > And, I like proposal X better than Y because of > Z. > > b. NO, I do not need AS doing anything else than > http > and am perfectly happy with status-quo now. > Just > forget the whole thing. > > I apologize for not being more precise. > > If a. turns out to be everbody's darling, then there > are > two excellent proposals for making this work. If > somebody > has a better solution, lets see this as RFE. Then, > get a > couple of (knowledgeable) people vote in democratic > way > about what's the better solution. I think there is a > AOLSERVER-DEVEL (or such) list where deeper > technical > issues can be discussed in a smaller audience. > > If b. well, than it is clear. We just leave it > as-is. > > Can we agree on this? > > Zoran > > > -- > AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ > > To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an > email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the > body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. > You can leave the Subject: field of your email > blank. > -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
