Here is the information at the time of having just 1
CPU at 99% (which is at the best 50% of a real CPU,
since we have Hyper Threading enabled in the Dual-Xeon
box):

Thread Locks

    name        owner   id      nlock   nbusy
    mu11                 11      3       0
    mu54                 54      26      0
    mu55                 55      2       0
    mu56                 56      168     0
    mu59                 59      1       0
    mu60                 60      0       0
    mu63                 63      2       0
    mu64                 64      11654   1
    mu65                 65      4681    0
    mu69                 69      1       0
    ns:cache:ds_page_bits                61      2       0
    ns:cache:ns:dnsaddr                  14      20      0
    ns:cache:ns:dnshost                  13      2       0
    ns:cache:nsadp:ges2:0x1302e008               70      1       0
    ns:cache:nsadp:ges2:0xd24ec50                68      2       0
    ns:cache:nsfp:ges2                   28      653     0
    ns:cache:secret_tokens               58      3540    0
    ns:cache:util_memoize                57      579876          1025
    ns:caches            1       25      0
    ns:callbacks                 15      4       0
    ns:cs:0              0       1493    1
    ns:cs:1              52      8       0
    ns:cs:2              53      2       0
    ns:cs:3              66      4       0
    ns:dns               6       18      0
    ns:encodings                 3       6457    6
    ns:interp            9       0       0
    ns:listencallbacks                   4       0       0
    ns:log               5       1657    1
    ns:rw:0              16      5096    5
    ns:rw:1              31      132882          24
    ns:sched             8       216     0
    ns:urlspace                  7       4512    1
    nsadp:pages:ges2             30      4       0
    nscache:commonTclCaches              34      2       0
    nscache:tclCaches:ges2               35      565306          150
    nscgi:ges2                   38      0       0
    nsd:conf             2       3       0
    nsd:proxy:ges2               29      0       0
    nsd:queue::ges2              32      4821    0
    nsd:requests                 10      4303    1
    nsdb:ceps1                   46      30      0
    nsdb:ceps2                   47      4       0
    nsdb:ceps3                   48      4       0
    nsdb:idea1                   49      4       0
    nsdb:idea2                   50      4       0
    nsdb:idea3                   51      4       0
    nsdb:pool1                   39      5314    0
    nsdb:pool2                   40      836     1
    nsdb:pool3                   41      8       0
    nsdb:pool4                   42      8       0
    nsdb:udb1            43      114     0
    nsdb:udb2            44      8       0
    nsdb:udb3            45      4       0
    nsldap:ldap                  36      4       0
    nsldap:ldap2                 37      4       0
    nslog:ges2                   33      2336    3
    nstcl:chans:ges2             27      0       0
    nstcl:sets:ges2              26      0       0
    nstcl:share:ges2             25      0       0
    nsv:0:ges2                   24      176237          91
    nsv:1:ges2                   23      317412          55
    nsv:2:ges2                   22      272955          157
    nsv:3:ges2                   21      808303          684
    nsv:4:ges2                   20      230354          131
    nsv:5:ges2                   19      149349          294
    nsv:6:ges2                   18      382672          364
    nsv:7:ges2                   17      300966          159
    tcljob:ns_eval_q:ges2                62      0       0
    threadPool                   12      1       0

Any comments on that?
Greetings,
Rocael.


--- Dossy Shiobara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 2006.03.01, Rocael Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Any ideas or suggestions on how to make aolserver
> to
> > use both CPUs in the first box mentioned?
> 
> Are both boxes running the exact same application
> code?
> 
> One CPU could be waiting on a object (mutex,
> semaphore, condvar, etc.)
> that the other CPU is holding.  If you have some
> form of "stats
> interface" (nstelemetry, or otherwise) ... what does
> your lock
> contention stats look like?  What percentage of
> total locks are nbusy?
> 
> -- Dossy
> 
> -- 
> Dossy Shiobara              | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> http://dossy.org/
> Panoptic Computer Network   | http://panoptic.com/
>   "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh
> at your own
>     folly -- then you can let go and quickly move
> on." (p. 70)
> 
> 
> --
> AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
> 
> To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an
> email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
> body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message.
> You can leave the Subject: field of your email
> blank.
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: 
field of your email blank.

Reply via email to