On Mar 23, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Brian Fenton wrote:

Do people think it's ok to proceed with CharExpansion=2. I'm cautious
about setting it as it's unclear how it works together with my NLS_LANG
setting (does it ignore it?) and I've already had plenty of character
set fun!


If CharExpansion=2 works for you then I'd say use it. The only negative impact is that it will use more memory. If I remember correctly it just allocates (buffer*char_expansion) bytes of memory.

- Jeremy


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: 
field of your email blank.

Reply via email to