On 2008.03.04, Michael Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK - I'll take a look tonight. I think that a 0 as the threadtimeout
> value use to mean "no timeout". I guess I'll need to look at the C to
> see what the changes were.
>
> Is this file even needed anymore?
IMHO, the semantics around timeouts should ALWAYS be:
<= -1 == infinite
0 == immediate
>= 1 == n units
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject:
field of your email blank.
