The following reply was made to PR other/212; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: other/212: name resolution of vhosts Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 18:49:24 -0700 (MST)
On Fri, 28 Feb 1997, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > This has also been reported as PR#105 in the Apache bug > database. Not really. That was about it not starting and saying it should skip them; that is a valid request. This one is mostly saying Apache doesn't need the hostname, which is entirely false; HTTP/1.1 and non-IP virtual hosts require that Apache know the hostname. As I told the user on c.i.w.s.u, if you don't want Apache to insist on reverse DNS use a ServerName directive to tell it what to use. Haven't had time to look at what is being said about the logging yet. On the surface, this just looks to be a feature request; I am unsure about if that is a good idea because it obscures what configured virutal domain a request was for, but may be ok as a seperate variable. Not before 1.2 in any case.
