What is the prototype for inet_addr, and the definition for INADDR_NONE? I suspect the differences will be there.
I'll try compiling with cc in the meantime, although I suspect the same effect shall be had.. --brett On Fri, 25 April 1997, at 13:15:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have absolutely no problem with DU 3.2 and the bundled > cc(1) compiler. Therefore, I suspect either the differences > to DU 4.0 or gcc. Can you please try building with the > DU compiler and see if the behaviour changes? >
