The following reply was made to PR suexec/1084; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: suexec/1084: start-problem (fwd)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 07:35:00 -0600 (MDT)

 
 
 
 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 09:18:16 +0200 (MET DST)
 From: Hans-Juergen Seekamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 To: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Subject: Re: suexec/1084: start-problem (fwd)
 
 Many thank for your helps,
 the backround of my problems was :
 I have destroyed any dynamic links in an update-work from
 linux 2.0.27 to 2.030 and now the httpd from apache is running
 under http://map_1.iae.tu-berlin.de
 To first i have:
 Server version Apache/1.0.0. 
 and i have not found the "lcok" -file over all harddisks
 then i get the apache src from www.apache.com and compiled this.
 (./apache_1.3a1/src/httpd)..
 As i see the same error-message, i think "lcok"-file is "lock"..
 please make this correct in the source-code or binarys...
 (sorry my language is bad)
 by for now hans
 
 
  /'\__\  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ h.-j.seekamp   /__\__|o|__ /__\
 (  o o )   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |__|  |=|   |__|   
  \  - /   [EMAIL PROTECTED] -P R O AGRAR  U N I- BERLIN
   http://map_1.iae.tu-berlin.de/~sir/ "'ne freundschaft aus biergaerten"
 taugt mehr als 'ne freundschaft aus dem internet" (roman herzog)
 
 
 On Thu, 4 Sep 1997, Marc Slemko wrote:
 
 > 
 > >  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > >  Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 11:03:18 +0200 (MET DST)
 > >  From: Hans-Juergen Seekamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > >  To: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > >  Subject: Re: suexec/1084: start-problem
 > >  
 > >  thank you , sorry, but my error: ("Cannot open lcok file") is not demaged
 > 
 > Hmm?  Do you mean you still have the problem?
 > 
 > Looking further, if you are getting lcok instead of lock then I
 > don't think you are using version 1.3a1 as you reported.  Please
 > confirm what version of Apache you are using.  Run "httpd -v" to
 > get the version number.
 > 
 > In any case, please try 1.2.4.
 > 
 

Reply via email to