The following reply was made to PR mod_auth-any/1097; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: mod_auth-any/1097: Several require statements in a <limit> env. ? Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:58:53 -0600 (MDT) On Fri, 5 Sep 1997, Andreas Jung wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > On Fri, 5 Sep 1997, Marc Slemko wrote: > > > Synopsis: Several require statements in a <limit> env. ? > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > > State-Changed-By: marc > > State-Changed-When: Fri Sep 5 08:24:04 PDT 1997 > > State-Changed-Why: > > No, that is not possible. As the docs for the satisfy directive > > say, it controls if hostname/IP authentication is needed > > in addition to user authentication or if just one is needed. > > > > a require user and require group statement mean both are > > needed. > > > > Ok, both the "require user" and the "require group" must be satisfied in > the sense of a logical AND. But how can one express a logical OR ? Right now, as far as I can think, you can't. Yes, it is a shortcoming. > Logical AND makes less sense. In most cases we have a group and one > special user how that should have access to a special area. Do I have > always to create a new group for this area containing all members of the > group including the special user...that's a bit oversized and leads > to a large group file.
