The following reply was made to PR config/1226; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dean Gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dave Pifke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: config/1226: Apache seems to "forget" about DocumentRoot for VirtualHosts. Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 15:10:32 -0700 (PDT) So the name-based (IP-less) virtual hosts are specified using DNS names? Are there any errors in the error_log? You can specify them by IP as well -- just put the IP on which they're normally supposed to respond... so you'll have a whole bunch with the same IP, but that's fine. The <VirtualHost> directive defines what IP address a host exists on. We've also rewritten this code in 1.3. Dean On Sat, 18 Oct 1997, Dave Pifke wrote: > On 18 Oct 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Synopsis: Apache seems to "forget" about DocumentRoot for VirtualHosts. > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback > > State-Changed-By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 18 04:59:37 PDT 1997 > > State-Changed-Why: > > > > Please give more details about your configuration... > > > > Are you using ip-based virtual hosts or name-based virtual hosts > > or do you mix both in your config? In what order? > > We're using a mixture of both, with the IP-less virtual hosts first in the > file, followed by the IP-based virtual hosts. There are about 100 site > that resolve to the same IP as the server (web.slip.net), and now about > 2400 that have their own IP address. The latter group are specified with > IP address (not FQDN) in the config file. > > > -- > Dave Pifke, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sr. System Administrator, Slip.Net > >
