The following reply was made to PR mod_cgi/1292; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:  Subject: RE: mod_cgi/1292: post method randomly works (fwd)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 09:14:33 -0600 (MDT)

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 12:16:45 +0100
 From: Lee Pollington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Jon Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Livermore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Subject: RE: mod_cgi/1292: post method randomly works
 
 thanks for the response - 
 
 I tried turning keepalive off, however the 
 problem persisted, we saw it on Netscape
 3.03 Unix, 3.01 NT, and 3.0 95, and 
 communicator professional. I didn't 
 test IE. I found no randomness, it always
 occured, however the data did sometimes get 
 through from the post when the browser was 
 reloaded.
 
 I'm sorry to hear you will not be continuing with
 this, I have had to revert to 1.2.0 (where the problem
 doesn't exist), and loose the benefits I found in 1.2.4,
 namely the fewest server errors we have ever had
 
 If you want us to liase on a tcp test, or whatever
 I will talk to our Unix adminstrators about setting 
 something up
 
 thanks again for the prompt response
 
 Lee
 
 > ----------
 > From:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > Sent:        Wednesday, October 22, 1997 1:38 AM
 > To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > Subject:     Re: mod_cgi/1292: post method randomly works
 > 
 > Synopsis: post method randomly works
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
 > State-Changed-By: dgaudet
 > State-Changed-When: Tue Oct 21 17:38:31 PDT 1997
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > This is probably the same problem as that described in
 > PR#1142 <http://bugs.apache.org/index/full/1142>.  I have
 > tracked that problem to a bug in Navigator when it deals
 > with keep-alive connections.  I have been unable to produce
 > a simple test example, or to narrow down which versions cause
 > it.  It also appears that there is no workaround other than
 > to disable all keep-alive, something which is not a workaround
 > at all in my books.  So I've given up researching this
 > problem for now.
 > 
 > Dean
 > 
 

Reply via email to