Lars, Aha! I think I understand the situation better. It appears that the problem was not so much that the extensions were AddTyped in srm.conf, so much as they were Typed to be text/x-server-parsed-html So this caused the server to SSI-ify them. I guess that the Action directive is not processed on a file that already has a handler. Is this correct? Is there a way around this? (To have a .html file which has already been AddTyped to be text/x-server-parsed-html be parsed by and Action command?) Perhaps this should be mentioned in the documentation for the Action command?
Thanks, Ryan On Thu, 6 Nov 1997, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > According to Ryan Hamilton: > > > Are you able to reproduce this behavior? > > No, I tried it with the same configuration, but it worked as > expected. Do you see any errors in your error log? > > > ciao... > -- > Lars Eilebrecht - Modesty: Being comfortable that others > [EMAIL PROTECTED] will discover your greatness. > http://www.si.unix-ag.org/~sfx/ >
