>Number: 1485 >Category: documentation >Synopsis: Example should use a 301 permanent redirect >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: apache >State: open >Class: mistaken >Submitter-Id: apache >Arrival-Date: Wed Nov 26 06:10:01 PST 1997 >Last-Modified: >Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Organization: apache >Release: >Environment: The Web >Description: http://www.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_asis.html shows an example of an .asis redirection which is a clear candidate for 301, not 302.
It's no problem of course, I'm just interested in raising the awareness of the existence of cachable redirection. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
