The following reply was made to PR mod_auth-any/1737; it has been noted by 
GNATS.

From: "A. R. M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marc Slemko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Apache bugs database" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mod_auth-any/1737: mod_auth_msql no longer included: old one 
vseems incompatible!
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 12:32:53 -0500

 Yes Mark, I already tried that. I tried recompiling msql too and then I
 tried Apache again. I tried Apache with IRIXN32 set to both yes and no at
 different times, neither worked! :(
 I already sent my Configuration and the Makefile from src/modules/standard
 to coar.
 
 I never had -any- problems with 1.2.* releases of Apache. It has been one of
 the rare products that compiled without any tweeking on Irix boxes which
 maybe known for their weird configs.
 
 :> :Synopsis: mod_auth_msql no longer included: old one seems incompatible!
 :> :
 :> :State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
 :> :State-Changed-By: marc
 :> :State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 27 21:23:02 PST 1998
 :> :State-Changed-Why:
 :> :No, we really don't want to provide it any more for two reasons.
 :> :First, it is very restricted and there are a lot more databases
 :> :than msql.  Second, there is on one around to maintain it or
 :> :support it and it is really an outside thing.
 :> :
 :> :It sounds like you are trying to link an old .o file with
 :> :a new binary.  Try removing mod_auth_msql.o before
 :> :compiling.
 :>
 :> If I try compiling it without the msql module it compiles fine. But I DO
 :> need that module as I'm sure everyone else using msql does.
 :> I downloaded the source (.c) file for mod_auth_msql not the .o file and I
 :> let the compiler create the object file along with all the other objects.
 :> What it complains about is the msql .a files in .../msql/lib which are
 :> linked with the -l option and yes it does complain about it (them) being
 :> older.
 :
 :Then you probably compiled one of the two with -n32 and one wit, or
 :something similar.
 :
 :Try changing the IRIXN32 line in your Configuration file to no.
 

Reply via email to