The following reply was made to PR protocol/1789; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: protocol/1789: Invalid method on POST
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 16:13:16 -0500

 Thanks, Dean. I think I'll stick with the 1.2.6 version. Our testers have been 
banging on it all day and haven't come across a single glitch, so it
 looks solid. I greatly appreciate your help.
 
 

Reply via email to