The following reply was made to PR config/1828; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Lars Eilebrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Julianne Weekers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: config/1828: ResourceConfig option ignored by VirtualHost co
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 19:17:24 +0100 (CET)

 According to Julianne Weekers:
 
 >  I cannot get the Virtual Host config to use a different ResourceConfig
 >  from the main one.  The option just seems to be ignored.
 >  No errors are generated.
 [...]
 >  The thing I'm trying to avoid is having the Alias entries in the main
 >  config apply to the VirtualHosts.  It is an easy test if you have the main
 >  one with an aliase and the virtual file without it and see if you can
 >  get the alias to fail on the virtual address.
 
 Every configuration entry in srm.conf is set for the 'main server'
 and most configuration entries (Alias, DefaultType, <Directory> etc.)
 from the 'main server' are merged into _every_ virtual host.
 It is possible to define a new resource config for a virtual host,
 but you only override settings from the standard srm.conf. The
 configuration entries from your srm.conf file are still merged
 into the virtual host.
 
 To solve your problem you can create a "_default_" virtual host
 for your main server and move any configuration that is specific
 to the main server into the "_default_" virtual host section.
  
 
 
 Regards...
 -- 
 Lars Eilebrecht
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

Reply via email to