The following reply was made to PR os-windows/2211; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: os-windows/2211: Extracting the ICONS folder into the wrong location Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 09:37:23 -0600 (MDT) On 20 May 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Synopsis: Extracting the ICONS folder into the wrong location > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > State-Changed-By: brian > State-Changed-When: Tue May 19 20:22:56 PDT 1998 > State-Changed-Why: > We are trying to keep the Unix and NT distributions as > similar as possible. This is one artifact of that > decision. The reason icons are separate is partly > historical, but also because it's a good way to demonstrate > the "Alias" directive, which you can find in the srm.conf-win-dist > file in the distribution. Give that a whirl. So why isn't the alias uncommented by default?
