Ken - I don't think a bug report should go immediately from "open" to
"feedback" asking simply "is it still happening?". There should be some
minimal effort put in to see if the bug they are reporting is still
occuring in the latest 1.2.x or 1.3.x; and if it's not there *then* ask the
submitter to check again. We can't just presume it's likely that the bug
was fixed, unless you know of a specific commit which might have fixed it.
Of course if the bug is still there then it gets promoted to analyzed.
Brian
At 07:28 PM 5/28/98 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
>[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
>[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
>[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
>
>
>Synopsis: ftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't work through a proxy, where
ftp://foo.bar does.
>
>State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback
>State-Changed-By: coar
>State-Changed-When: Thu May 28 12:28:19 PDT 1998
>State-Changed-Why:
>[This is a standard response.]
>This Apache problem report has not been updated recently.
>Please reply to this message if you have any additional
>information about this issue, or if you have answers to
>any questions that have been posed to you. If there are
>no outstanding questions, please consider this a request
>to try to reproduce the problem with the latest software
>release, if one has been made since last contact. If we
>don't hear from you, this report will be closed.
>
>
--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
pure chewing satisfaction [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
