>Number:         2333
>Category:       general
>Synopsis:       Location headers from nph-*.cgi
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Jun  1 07:30:01 PDT 1998
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Organization:
apache
>Release:        1.3b7
>Environment:
Linux RH5.1
uname -a -> 
Linux web1.webben.dk 2.0.34 #2 Sun May 31 03:03:40 CEST 1998 i686 unknown
gcc version 2.7.2.3
>Description:
I have one web server running a bannernetwork, it is Apache 1.3b3 RH5.0 kernel 
2.0.33 it sends out the following:

Connected to bannerbyt.dk.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET /nph-bb.cgi?num=1
HTTP/1.0 302
Cache-control: no-cache
Location: /bbp/4499.gif
Content-type: text/html

<head><title>Object Moved</title>
<a href="/bbp/4499.gif"><h1>BannerByt Picture</h1></a>
</head>
Connection closed by foreign host.

But when I make the same request running Apache 1.3b7 it closes the connection 
before sending the above output. The script runs correctly, I can verify that 
through an interactive shell, so the output from the CGI scripts is indeed as 
under Apache 1.3b3

And when making the request it enters the logfile with a fine 200 so Apache 
does not think it is in error.

When we developed the banner network we decided to go with nph- cgi's to 
control the caching of banners. But when I read the FAQ it says that nph- more 
or less was of no importance in 1.3 only in 1.2, that was indeed not the case 
for 1.3b3 in the way we did it.

And now, well I can make the script run by changing the script to bb.cgi 
omitting the nph- but if thats the solution for me, that means telling 4000 
individuals to once again change their html code.

So how do I make 1.3b7 behave like 1.3b3 ?
>How-To-Repeat:
http://www.bannerbyt.dk/nph-bb.cgi?num=1
http://www.bannerbyt.dk/test.cgi?num=1
http://195.41.48.61/nph-bb.cgi?num=1
http://195.41.48.61/bb.cgi?num=1 

The above four are alle the EXACT same scripts. The two first are on 1.3b3 and 
the two last ones are on 1.3b7
>Fix:
No. And it is not possible for us to change from one html tag to another, as we 
estimate a loss of 10% of all members performing such an operation.
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]



Reply via email to