The following reply was made to PR mod_rewrite/2621; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Elliott Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_rewrite/2621: strcat() on line 3197 does not take four parameters. Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 02:21:03 -0700 (PDT) I apologize for skimming the report too quickly and assuming it was the same as the 304 other dumb ones. No insult was intended. The patch that was actually applied, as is present in the patch directory, does use sprintf (well, it was fixed after the fact to use ap_snprintf). On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Elliott Martin wrote: > If you had read my bug submission properly you would have noticed that I > HAVE seen the bug fix in your database. However, I was trying to offer > another (*possibly* better) way of fixing it. I'm sorry for trying to > further the knowledge base of your project. > > Elliott Martin. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 15 July 1998 19:31 > Subject: Re: mod_rewrite/2621: strcat() on line 3197 does not take four > parameters. > > > >Synopsis: strcat() on line 3197 does not take four parameters. > > > >State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > >State-Changed-By: marc > >State-Changed-When: Wed Jul 15 11:16:41 PDT 1998 > >State-Changed-Why: > >PLEASE do as we ask and search the bugdb before submitting > >a report. It should seem likely that something as obvious > >as this would be fixed by now. > > > >Please see http://www.apache.org/dist/patches/apply_to_1.3.0/ > > > > > > >
