The following reply was made to PR mod_cgi/3069; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Apache bugs database <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:  Subject: Re: mod_cgi/3069: Apache won't run WIN generated perlscripts, that
 do work in commandline (fwd)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 22:37:58 -0700 (PDT)

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 00:55:27 +0200
 From: Soren Birk Jacobsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: mod_cgi/3069: Apache won't run WIN generated perlscripts,
      that do work in commandline
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 > [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
 > [you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
 > [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
 > [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
 > [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
 > [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
 > [from a developer.                                      ]
 > [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!         ]
 >
 > Synopsis: Apache won't run WIN generated perlscripts, that do work in 
 > commandline
 >
 > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
 > State-Changed-By: marc
 > State-Changed-When: Thu Sep 24 16:23:26 PDT 1998
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > First, we can not support 1.1.1 any more since it is ancient.
 >
 > Second, this is not an appropriate quesiton for a "bug report".
 > Please use the procedures detailed as alternatives on the page
 > before you submit your report, eg. Usenet.
 >
 > We can not give basic user support to millions of users.
 > If your problem is caused by lack of line ending translation,
 > then you should be sure to transfer the file with ftp in
 > ascii mode or load it up in the pico editor after transferring
 > and then save it to disk.
 >
 > However, you really need to ask in somewhere such as Usenet
 > since this is not an appropriate place.
 
   Sorry, I just couldn't find anyplace else, and the description i the FAQ 
wasn't
 really usefull, btw. the only usegroup I've been able to find dealing directly 
with
 apache is japan.www.server.apache but tjis isn't too active and most of the 
content
 is in Japanese (but I did post the problem).
 
 anyway thanks
 
 kurgan
 

Reply via email to