The following reply was made to PR config/4081; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mark (Mookie) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: config/4081: ServerAdmin and ServerName should be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 06:15:22 -0800 (PST)

 >Synopsis: ServerAdmin and ServerName should be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >
 >State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
 >State-Changed-By: lars
 >State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 20 11:53:20 PST 1999
 >State-Changed-Why:
 >
 >In many situations the hostname is guessed correctly
 >and if not it is always possible to change it in the
 >configuration. There is no need to 'rebuild' Apache!?
 
 I didn't say it had to be rebuilt, my packages did however. I stated I didn't
 think it a correct choice to deliberately include the build machines hostname
 in a configuration file. It creates a situation where unecessary information
 is contained in the conf files. (Un-necessary in the sense it's doesn't require
 the compiling host's hostname to be put into a file simply to make a 
httpd.conf.
 We have flagged it as a bug which will be levied against any future apache
 releases before they are allowed to be distributed internally.
 
 Cheers,
 Mark
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to