The following reply was made to PR mod_jserv/4817; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Stefan Walcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ed Korthof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Stefan Walcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_jserv/4817: DSO build impossible Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 19:11:49 +0100 At 08:19 05.08.99 -0700, Ed Korthof wrote: >supporting DSOs is done by including mod_so in your build -- please check >to see if it's present, with 'httpd -l'. If not, you need to run >configure with --enable-module=so before building Apache. > >If that's not the problem, please indicate so. FYI, it is possible to >build DSOs, at least with some configurations (this is more actively >maintained than static compilation). > >hth -- > >Ed HI, mod_so is included in apache, in fact as mentioned below, I did compile it with --enable-shared=most --enable-module=max that should actually include --enable-module=so. If I do a httpd -l only mod_core and mod_so are listed. so the Problem seems to be somewhere else. FYI this works all fine under debian Linux and Sparc Solaris 2.6. Maybe it is a bug in the Solaris 2.7 Environment. >On 4 Aug 1999, Stefan Walcz wrote: > > > >Number: 4817 > > >Category: mod_jserv > > >Synopsis: DSO build impossible > > >Confidential: no > > >Severity: non-critical > > >Priority: medium > > >Responsible: jserv > > >State: open > > >Class: sw-bug > > >Submitter-Id: apache > > >Arrival-Date: Wed Aug 4 06:40:00 PDT 1999 > > >Last-Modified: > > >Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Organization: > > apache > > >Release: Apache 1.3.6 JServ 1.0 final > > >Environment: > > Java 1.2.1_03 solaris 7 Intel > > >Description: > > configure does not recognize that apache has been built with DSO > support when using the > > the --with-apache-install parameter > > >How-To-Repeat: > > try to build apache with --enable-shared=most --enable-module=max (or > was it the other way around ;-)) on solaris 7 > > then try to build jserv as a module. > > >Fix: > > sorry no > > >Audit-Trail: > > >Unformatted: > > [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need] > > [to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line and make sure the] > > [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ] > > [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ] > > ["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ] > > [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ] > > ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ] > > [the database automatically because of the potential for mail ] > > [loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] > > [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ] > > [developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] > > > > > > - { { stefan walcz { xmachina GmbH { maassstrasse 24 < 69123 heidelberg { 06221/822021 -> phone { 06221/822040 -> fax { http://www.xmachina.de { -