>Number: 3861
>Category: general
>Synopsis: Apache HTTP Server 1.25 Y2K Compliant?
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: apache
>State: open
>Class: support
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Mon Feb 8 18:50:00 PST 1999
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Organization:
apache
>Release: 1.25
>Environment:
n/a
>Description:
While the question is simple, its importance for Y2K certification efforts is
critical.
The FAQ 'Apache HTTP Server Version 1.3' @ www.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html
#62 "Is Apache Year 2000 compliant states "Yes, Apache is Year 2000 compliant.".
Is this statement also applicable to the Apache HTTP Server 1.25? If not, please
advise of corrective methods (e.g. patches?). Is there a reference site which
summarizes a position of Y2K compliance for all Apache HTTP Server versions?
The FAQ is written in such a way that one draw 2 different conclusions:
(1) assume #62 is only applicable to V1.3 since this is the leading header
of the doucment
(2) assume #62 is applicable to all HTTP Server versions due to the generic
response/discussion under #62.
Thanks for your time.
>How-To-Repeat:
n/a
>Fix:
Clarify the FAQ on the website re: which releases other than 1.3 are Y2K
compliant or have a separate URL which summaries Y2K info. Thx.
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
[If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
[from a developer. ]
[Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]
