Alexei Kosut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, 4 Aug 1996, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > okay, so why did it say > > > > Bad avail line: unavai > > Because Paul (I think) mispelled unavail in the avail file. Someone should > probably fix it. But it doesn't hurt anything.
Uhh, yeah, fixed now. Harmless warning as far as commits are concerned. > > Vi's standard input and output must be a terminal. > > This comes about because cvs server has to do weird things with vi > and rcs to check in a file. I'm not sure exactly what, but it does it > every time. It's normal. Was this a remote commit? I'm not sure why but vi complains when doing a remote commit and the cvsedit script has had the checking of the return code disabled. You can safely ignore the error, the remote cvs access isn't fully smoothed out yet since not all of the local functionality can be implemented remotely. It doesn't affect the integrity of the repository, just some of the nicer trappings provided by the scripts don't work as well. -- Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd. (Netcraft Ltd. contractor) Elsevier Science TIS online journal project. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 (0)1865 843155
