coar        97/12/29 07:09:48

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
        Some rearrangement, format changes, and a new issue.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.39      +31 -24    apachen/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apachen/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.38
  retrieving revision 1.39
  diff -u -r1.38 -r1.39
  --- STATUS    1997/12/28 04:50:57     1.38
  +++ STATUS    1997/12/29 15:09:47     1.39
  @@ -131,18 +131,28 @@
   Concepts:
   
      * Jim's [CONCEPT] platform.h header file. Instead of lumping
  -     all OS stuff in conf.h, create a ./platforms/ sub-dir
  -     and have Configure copy and modify platform.h as needed.
  +     all OS stuff in conf.h, create a ./platforms/ sub-dir
  +     and have Configure copy and modify platform.h as needed.
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   
   In progress:
   
       * Martin Kraemer's [PATCH] Parsing URI into its components 
  -     This has "evolved" into a new module: util_uri. Martin
  -     will post when it's at a state where he's happy with it.
  +      This has "evolved" into a new module: util_uri. Martin
  +      will post when it's at a state where he's happy with it.
  +      Ken would like to see it in libap instead of libmain.
   
       * Ben's ASP work... All agree it sounds cool.
  -    
  +
  +    * DDA's adding a tray application to the Windoze version for ease of
  +      status/management.
  +     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  +     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  +     Status: Ken +1, Sameer +1, Martin +1, Ben +1 (as long as
  +     we get a single executable)
  +     Paul: No like Win95 specific stuff
  +     Ken: What's W95-specific about it?
  +
   Needs patch:
   
       * Dean's "locale" project
  @@ -158,8 +168,8 @@
   Open issues:
   
       * Paul would like to see a 'gdbm' option because he uses
  -     it a lot. Dean notes that 'gdbm' include 'db' support
  -     so we need to watch the library ordering.
  +      it a lot. Dean notes that 'gdbm' include 'db' support
  +      so we need to watch the library ordering.
   
        Dean notes:  Check rev 1.72 -> rev 1.73 of
        src/Configuration.tmpl.  I re-ordered mod_auth_dbm and
  @@ -168,23 +178,25 @@
        troubles if I automatically looked for gdbm.
   
       * What do we call the binary: apache or httpd? Under UNIX
  -     it's httpd, under Win32 it's apache. Maybe rename it
  -     to apache-httpd?
  +      it's httpd, under Win32 it's apache. Maybe rename it
  +      to apache-httpd?
  +     apache-httpd: Ken +1
   
       * Maybe a http_paths.h file? See
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   
       * Release builds: Should we provide Configuration or not?
  -     Should we 'make all suexec' in src/support?
  -     
  +      Should we 'make all suexec' in src/support?
  +     Ken +1 (possible suexec path issue, though)
  +
       * root's environment is inherited by the Apache server. Jim, Ken &
  -     Dean thinks we should recommend using 'env' to build the
  -     appropriate environment. Marc and Alexei don't see any
  -     big deal.
  +      Dean thinks we should recommend using 'env' to build the
  +      appropriate environment. Marc and Alexei don't see any
  +      big deal.
   
       * Ken suggests that new check_cmd_context() and related defines
  -     should be non-static and in util_* so modules can use 'em.  (He
  -     didn't notice this flaw during the review.)
  +      should be non-static and in util_* so modules can use 'em.  (He
  +      didn't notice this flaw during the review.)
   
       * Sameer's mod_so implemetation
        See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  @@ -200,14 +212,9 @@
       * Marc's socket options like source routing (kill them?)
        Marc, Dean, Martin say Yes
   
  -    * DDA's adding a tray application to the Windoze version for ease of
  -      status/management.
  -     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  -     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  -     Status: Ken +1, Sameer +1, Martin +1, Ben +1 (as long as
  -     we get a single executable)
  -     Paul: No like Win95 specific stuff
  -
       * Marc's [BUG] include virtual and SCRIPT_NAME w/path_info
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   
  +    * Ken's PR#1053: an error when accessing a negotiated document
  +      explicitly names the variant selected.  Should it do so, or should
  +      the base input name be referenced?
  
  
  

Reply via email to