coar 98/01/17 23:07:20
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
Add some votes, move the ap_snprintf() issue (which is PRE-PATCH
and has an alternative) out of the "patches available" section,
and note that lazy voting and commit-then-review are currently
disallowed.
Revision Changes Path
1.96 +17 -12 apachen/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apachen/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.95
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -r1.95 -r1.96
--- STATUS 1998/01/18 04:16:51 1.95
+++ STATUS 1998/01/18 07:07:19 1.96
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Apache STATUS:
+Apache 1.3 STATUS:
Release:
@@ -9,6 +9,11 @@
1.3b3: Released and announced
1.3b1: There is no 1.3b1
+Current Modes:
+
+ o Review-Then-Commit
+ o NO lazy voting
+
Plan:
Showstoppers:
@@ -135,13 +140,6 @@
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: Marc +1, Dean +1 (with note), Paul +1
- * Dean's [PRE-PATCH] expanding ap_snprintf()
- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Status: Dean +1, Ben +1, Jim 0, Martin 0, Brian +1(?)
- See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- for a more up-to-date idea (int vformatter) that has a
- vote of +1 from Dean, Ben, Martin, Paul and Jim for concept
-
Concepts:
* Jim's [CONCEPT] platform.h header file. Instead of lumping
@@ -149,6 +147,13 @@
and have Configure copy and modify platform.h as needed.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * Dean's [PRE-PATCH] expanding ap_snprintf()
+ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ Status: Dean +1, Ben +1, Jim 0, Martin 0, Brian +1(?), Ken +1
+ See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ for a more up-to-date idea (int vformatter) that has a
+ vote of +1 from Dean, Ben, Martin, Paul, Jim, and Ken for concept
+
In progress:
* Martin Kraemer's [PATCH] Parsing URI into its components
@@ -311,14 +316,14 @@
* who should run the service? Who exactly is the "system account"?
- docs say:
+ docs say:
Localsystem is a very privileged account locally, so you shouldn't run
any shareware applications there. However, it has no network privileges
and cannot leave the machine via any NT-secured mechanism, including
file system, named pipes, DCOM, or secure RPC.
- and:
+ and:
A service that runs in the context of the LocalSystem account
inherits the security context of the SCM. It is not associated with
@@ -327,8 +332,8 @@
has several implications: [... removed ...]
- That _really_ sucks. Can we recommend running Apache as some
- other user?
+ That _really_ sucks. Can we recommend running Apache as some
+ other user?
* need a crypt() of some sort.
