dgaudet 98/03/26 11:44:46
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
So it's sunny now, and the outdoors is calling me... and any monumental
fixes I've been thinking about are somewhere deep in my mind I can't
find at the moment. I'm ready to "throw in the towel" so that unix
1.3.0 can get out there, and get into reviewer's hot little hands. I
know of a few groups that want to benchmark it, but really would prefer
to benchmark something released. I really don't want to see us with
win32 tied to unix release schedule forever... it's pointless.
It's all just names anyhow. Whether we call it a beta or a current
release it's just a name. It's time we at least had a "release candidate"
to use the 1.2 terminology... I'm with Roy, I want to drop the x.ybz
designations. I want x.y.z, a single numbering scheme.
Revision Changes Path
1.220 +15 -1 apache-1.3/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.219
retrieving revision 1.220
diff -u -r1.219 -r1.220
--- STATUS 1998/03/26 15:17:27 1.219
+++ STATUS 1998/03/26 19:44:45 1.220
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
* Ken's slight reworking of the Apache LICENSE to clarify the restricted
nature of usage of the name "Apache" in derived products
Status: Ken +1, Paul +1, Ben +1, Jim +1, Randy +1, Roy +1,
- Chuck +1, MarkC +1, Ralf +1, Sameer +1, Martin +1
+ Chuck +1, MarkC +1, Ralf +1, Sameer +1, Martin +1, Dean +1
* Ralf's
Apache 1.3 Autoconf-*style* Interface (APACI)
@@ -402,6 +402,20 @@
handling this need.
Status: Dean +1, Rasmus +1, Paul +1, Roy +1, Jim +1,
Martin +1, Ralf +1
+
+ * Don't wait for WIN32: It's been quite some time and WIN32 doesn't seem
+ to be progressing, and Unix seems quite stable. It would be in Apache's
+ best interest to continue to support Unix to its utmost, and not delay
+ a release of 1.3.0 waiting for WIN32 issues to be resolved.
+
+ Proposal: the next release should be named 1.3.0 and should be labelled
+ "stable on unix, beta on NT".
+ +1: Dean
+
+ Proposal: the next release should be named 1.3b6, and labelled "release
+ candidate on unix, beta on NT". The release after that will be
+ called 1.3.0 "stable on unix, beta on NT".
+ +0: Dean
Win32 specific issues:
