Not to sound pushy or anything, but any chance you'll run the same test
for either apache-apr or the pthread-mpm. They are basically the same
code, so there is really no need to run the test on both servers. I would
be interested to see if the static number of processes/ dynamic threads
is really a big win though.
Ryan
On 12 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rse 99/08/12 06:25:26
>
> Modified: mpm README.rse
> Log:
> Give more details
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.5 +3 -2 apache-2.0/mpm/README.rse
>
> Index: README.rse
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-2.0/mpm/README.rse,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> retrieving revision 1.5
> diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
> --- README.rse 1999/08/12 12:09:29 1.4
> +++ README.rse 1999/08/12 13:25:26 1.5
> @@ -98,8 +98,9 @@
> $ make
> $ make install
>
> - Some quick tests with the dexter MPM and both GNU Pth and FreeBSD uthread
> - showed the not too bad results with ApacheBench under the following
> config:
> + Some quick tests with the dexter MPM and both GNU Pth and FreeBSD
> uthread on
> + a PII/400 under FreeBSD 3.1 showed the not too bad results with
> ApacheBench
> + under the following config:
>
> NumServers 1
> StartThreads 32
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4205 S Miami Blvd
RTP, NC 27709 It's a beautiful sight to see good dancers
doing simple steps. It's a painful sight to
see beginners doing complicated patterns.
