Grr, looks like this causes problems for some people. We can 1) remove
the color attributes or 2) use #000000. I prefer #2. Thoughts?
Brian
--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.apache.org http://www.organic.com/jobs
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 97 21:13:35 CDT
From: John Van Essen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bgcolor=white and old Changes file
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Brian Behlendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 31 May 1997, John Van Essen wrote:
>> Can you please go back to allowing the user's preferences to be used
>> (i.e. remove the color settings)? Or else use numbers, like
>> bgcolor="#ffffff" to get white.
>
>Is it causing an error in your browser?
Not an error, but Netscape 1.22 attempts to interpret "white"
using hex, and it apparently uses #0000e0, which is a darkish
blue, which happens to be close to the default link color.
I can barely see the blue links against the blue background.
It's tough to read black text against dark blue, also.
There are a couple of other pages with blue backgrounds, too
(from the bgcolor=white) that I've encountered at apache.org,
like /info/jdk-102.html for example.
I'd prefer a user-friendly omission of the <body> arguments. :) :)
John Van Essen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
