Well my only concern is fly-by-nights trying to make a quick buck. I have no problem with Stronghold incorporating some of the material.
Dean On Fri, 8 Aug 1997, sameer wrote: > So this brings up some issues. The SH docs right now include > some text from the apache docs, but most of it is a rewrite. If you > restrict the new docs for a commercial use then does commercial > documentation have to be a clean room effort? > > > No better way to screw up discussions than to mention licensing. I don't > > think the code license is appropriate for high quality documentation. Our > > current manual, while extensive, is not "book ready". But it's possible > > that this project would produce something which is book ready. We do not > > want someone to be able to print it and reap profits off our work... > > unlike software which is high overhead (nobody would buy from a > > fly-by-night, they look for support, etc.), books don't usually come with > > support contracts. > > > > Just food for thought. The documentation must be free, but it could have > > commercial restrictions added to it. > > > > Dean > > > > > > > -- > Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-986-8770 > President FAX: 510-986-8777 > C2Net > http://www.c2.net/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
