fanf 00/10/19 11:54:12
Modified: htdocs/manual/vhosts name-based.html Log: Be more emphatic about the number of browsers that don't do Host: headers. We love you, IE2. Revision Changes Path 1.14 +6 -6 httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/vhosts/name-based.html Index: name-based.html =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/vhosts/name-based.html,v retrieving revision 1.13 retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -u -r1.13 -r1.14 --- name-based.html 2000/09/13 20:14:47 1.13 +++ name-based.html 2000/10/19 18:54:11 1.14 @@ -33,12 +33,12 @@ what name it is being addressed as. Apache 1.1 and later support this approach as well as the old IP-address-per-hostname method.</P> -<P>The benefits of using the name-based virtual hosts is a -practically unlimited number of servers, ease of configuration and use, and -requires no additional hardware or software. -The main disadvantage is that the client must support this part of the -protocol. Almost all browsers do, but there are still small numbers of -old browsers in use who do not. This can cause problems, although a possible +<P>The benefits of using the name-based virtual hosts is a practically +unlimited number of servers, ease of configuration and use, and +requires no additional hardware or software. The main disadvantage is +that the client must support this part of the protocol. Almost all +browsers do, but there are still tiny numbers of very old browsers in +use which do not. This can cause problems, although a possible solution is addressed below.</P> <H2>Using name-based virtual hosts</H2>
